[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Does anyone else have anything to add to a 1.3.1 release of base?
As it is, we'll be adding openssl 0.9.7e
Quoting Patrick M McNeal <mcneal@xxxxxxxxx>:
We are already using 1.3.0 in production, so 1.3.1 would be in order.
On Jan 17, 2005, at 11:20 AM, Liam Hoekenga wrote:
lfs-base-1.3.0.T is lacking one thing I'd like to role into it -
There are three command files using it..
Would anyone object if I roled openssl 0.9.7e into lfs-base.T and
lfs-base-1.3.0.T? Or should I cut a new release (1.3.0? 1.3.0a?)