[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mountproc rc script + base transcript
My last suggestion had a potential problem with it. After further
testing, I think it's better to mount second or third proc entries from
The change I propose would be to change:
Which is later used as:
mount -a -t $NO_FS
So, does anyone have an opinion on this revised suggestion?
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Albert Bertram wrote:
I was looking through the rc scripts and I realized that I didn't like the
way mountproc mounts /proc. In particular, it does:
but I think it should really do:
mount -a -t proc
My argument is that one may want to have proc mounted in multiple locations,
for example, if you do work in a chrooted environment. If everyone is
comfortable with this change, I'd like enact it in the next version of base.
Speaking of base, has there been any work on that lately? I heard that there
may be some changes to it relatively soon, but I'm not sure how soon.
These items will appear in next week's agenda, but we can make that
discussion smoother if you have an opinion you can share via e-mail before